puleks.cc 
19Ibid.
20Volkan lists many such examples. The Czechs hold onto the memory of Bila Hora, the Lakota retain image of Wounded Knee, and Crimean Tartars define themselves by the shared experience of being deported from the Crimea. See Volkan, Bloodlines, p. 49.
21电影《暹罗玫瑰》（Siamese Renaissance）大涕上粹据的就是泰国小说《情牵两世》（Thawiphob）。
22Rachel Harrison, “Mind the Gap: (En)countering the West and the Making of Thai Identities on Film,” in Harrison and Jackson (eds.), Ambiguous Allure of the West, p. 114.
23There are several accounts of this incident. See Lawrence Palmer Briggs, “The Aubaret versus Bradley Case at Bangkok, 1866–1867,” Far Eastern Quarterly 6:3 (1947), pp. 262–282.
24Baker and Pasuk, A History of Thailand, pp. 76–77.
25Harrison and Jackson, Ambiguous Allure of the West, pp. 52–53.
26Ibid., p. 12.
27Benedict Anderson, “The State of Thai Studies: Studies of the Thai State,” in Eliezer B. Ayal (ed.), The Study of Thailand: Analyses of Knowledge, Approaches, and Prospects in Anthropology, Art History, Economics, History, and Political Science, Southeast Asia series, no. 54 (Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1978), p. 197.
28Harrison and Jackson, Ambiguous Allure of the West, p. 12.
29See Kasian Tejapira, Commodifying Marxism: The Formation of Modern Thai Radical Culture, 1927–1958 (Kyoto: Kyoto Areas Studies on Asia No. 3, 2001); Thongchai Winichakul. “The Quest for ‘Siwilai’: A Geographical Discourse of Civilizational Thinking in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Siam.” Journal of Asian Studies 59:3 (2002); Maurizio Peleggi, Lords of Things: The Fashioning of the Siamese Monarchy’s Modern Image (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2002).
30Peleggi, Lords of Things, p. 6.
31Harrison and Jackson, Ambiguous Allure of the West.
32Wan khru, January 19, 1938.
33腾苏．努农的说法，是泰国学者以「竹子外贰」解释泰国外贰政策的又一例证。但如果要相信泰国经历多场冲突战猴始终保持独立，我们就得忽略许多史实，包括捧本在1941年入侵、披汶对盟国宣战、数以千计捧军在二战期间洗驻泰国，以及战硕英国殖民军洗驻等等。
34Callahan, “Beyond Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism,” p. 497.
第一章架构损失：废除暹罗的不平等条约
01Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam (Bangkok: Bangkok Daily Mail, 1924), p. 5.
02M. B. Hooker, Laws of Southeast Asia, vol. 2: European Laws in Southeast Asia (Singapore: Butterworth and Company, 1988), p. 535.
03David Wyatt, Thailand: A Short History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003), p. 168.
04Lysa Hong, “ ‘Stranger within the Gates’: Knowing Semi-Colonial Siam as Extraterritorials,” Modern Asian Studies 38:2 (2004), p. 350.
05Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam, pp. 2–3.
06Ibid., p. 5.
07Ibid., p. 6.
08Ibid., p. 25.
09Ibid., p. 38.
10Kullada Kesboonchoo Mead, The Rise and Decline of Thai Absolutism (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 1–3.
11B. J. Terwiel, “The Bowring Treaty: Imperialism and the Indigenous Perspective,” Journal of Siam Society 79:2 (1991), p. 43.
12Ibid., p. 27.
13Ibid., pp. 27–28.
14Ibid., p. 30.
15Ibid., pp. 30–31.
16Ibid., p. 31 (italics mine).
17Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam, p. 25.
18Constance Wilson, “State and Society in the Reign of Mongkut, 1851–1868: Thailand on the Eve of Modernization” (Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 1970), p. 363.
19Thongchai Winichakul, Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1994), p. 88.
20Wilson, “State and Society,” pp. 538–541.
21Mathew Copeland, “Contested Nationalism and the 1932 Overthrow of the Absolute Monarchy in Siam” (Ph.D. diss., Australian National University, 1993), p. 14.
22Ibid.
23Patrick Tuck, The French Wolf and the Siamese Lamb: The French Threat to Siamese Independence, 1858–1907 (Bangkok: White Lotus Press, 1995), p. 126.
24Ibid., pp. 294–296.
25Ibid., p. 179.
26Ibid., p. 180.
27Ibid.
28Ibid.
29Wyatt, Thailand, p. 191.
30Ibid., p. 192.
31直到1919年，美国没有与暹罗签过任何可以与1907年暹罗与法国，以及1909年暹罗与英国相比的条约，所以与美国签订新约是暹罗的政策优先。See Peter B. Oblas, “A Very Small Part of World Affairs: Siam’s Policy on Treaty Revision and the Paris Peace Conference,” Journal of Siam Society 59:2 (1971), p. 58.
32Ibid., p. 62.
33暹罗所以想宣战，并不完全为了修改不平等条约，它同时也反映拉玛六世提升国家地位的战略。See Walter F. Vella, Chaiyo! King Vajiravudh and the Development of Thai Nationalism (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1978), pp. 109–110.
